Etiquetado: 22
- Este debate tiene 0 respuestas, 1 mensaje y ha sido actualizado por última vez el hace 1 año, 1 mes por jeffrymullaly86.
-
AutorEntradas
-
19 octubre, 2023 a las 7:38 am #12253jeffrymullaly86Participante
<br> This can be attributed to the rapid technological progress made in the early years of bitcoin mining (Figure 1). These advances rendered older hardware too inefficient to be profitable at reasonable electricity rates, leading to their exclusion in the estimates. As Bitcoin’s value and popularity grew, mining became increasingly competitive, sparking a remarkable mining hardware evolution. Services that want to minimize exchange rate risk will need to pass a lower expiry value when using the invoice RPC. Using this method, the images will not only be numbered, but will also list alphabetically correctly, making image file handling a whole lot easier. Of course you can ‘clip’ the save image depth using “-depth 8” so as to reduce the image size on disk, however that will also force Quantum Rounding effects as well (unless HDRI floating-point save is also enabled). Here is another technique of doing the same thing, but saving the original image in a named image register using “MPR:” (see below), instead of “-clone”<br>>
<br>> Going Here we save one copy of the original image into the “mpr:scroll” image register, before modifying the image still in memory after the write. This will reset the ‘input depth’ of the image to the IM memory quality so as to use the best posible quality for the intermediate image save. As such only enough memory to hold the original image and the new image that is generated is actually used, in the above process. However remember that this can result in a doubling of memory use to hold the write modified copy of the image. It also meant I could have just as easily generate the smaller images first, then the larger images after that, without problems, or modify the image in many different ways for each image file generated. Previous to ImageMagick version 6.2.0 the output filename of the above would have been “image.gif.0” to “image.gif.2”. Of course as previously there is no need to use “-write” on the final image, as we can just output it as normal<br>>
<br>> Of course there are ways to fix this. Of course only ImageMagick commands will read this format, so it is not suitable for transferring between different image processing packages. It is also suitable for ‘pipelining’ an image from one IM command to another, while passing image meta-data and other attributes assocated with the image. While on the subject of writing images, it is possible to write an image from the middle of a sequence of image operations, using the special “-write” image operator. I thus recommended you add a ‘%03d’ or whatever is appropriate, to the output filename whenever you plan on writing multiple images, as separate image files. If you are familiar with the ‘C’ language (look up the UNIX system man page for ‘printf’) then you will probably know that if you use something like “%03d” you will always get 3 digit numbers (with leading zeros) for the image sequence frame number. If you look closely at the filenames of the three images generated above, you will see that IM generated images named “image-0.gif” to “image-2.gif”. And if you have more than a hundred, you get three digit numbers too. If one day I have to own some for some reason, I will buy them at the market rate and get screwed, just as I do today with U.S<br>>
<br>> This works well for a small number of images, but if you have more than ten images you will get a mix of image with one digit and two digit numbers. As you can see we can use the Image List Operators to process a ‘clone’ of an image, write out the result, then delete and backtrack back to the original source image, repeating the process as many times as you need. However other formats will leave the source image as is (see MIFF and MPC below). For example, when saving to image formats like JPEG and PNG and so on. This special string will be replaced by the current image number of each image in sequence. As of IM version 6.2 you can use the “-scene” setting to set the starting number for the current image sequence. It also includes a good number of special image generators (as exampled in Canvas Creation). Not only can you use ‘%d’ for a decimal number, but you can use ‘%x’ for a hexadecimal number (lowercase), ‘%X’ for a hexadecimal number (uppercase), or ‘%o’ for an octal number<br>> -
AutorEntradas
- Debes estar registrado para responder a este debate.