Etiquetado: 25
- Este debate tiene 0 respuestas, 1 mensaje y ha sido actualizado por última vez el hace 9 meses, 2 semanas por duanehildebrant.
-
AutorEntradas
-
9 febrero, 2024 a las 9:13 am #28758duanehildebrantParticipante
<br> It appears crystal clear that as cryptocurrencies are becoming popular among the people who want to explore alternatives to fiat which have been ruling the world for centuries, the requirement for the news portal that provides Bitcoin news live is going up. 4. The other wallets receive the PSBT and send a further updated PSBT with their own pair of random nonces to the other wallets, or to a coordinator who works trustlessly on behalf of the wallets. That works perfectly well as a direct replacement for some uses of script-based multisig today, such as spending 2-of-2 LN funding outputs, but it’s a departure from other popular policies such as the 2-of-3 multisig script used by many exchanges. In the abnormal case, spending still works as expected and remains more efficient and private than publishing your multisig parameters onchain. Although users wanting minimal fees and maximal privacy may eventually switch to pure threshold signature schemes, the above scheme may also continue to remain in use because it provides onchain proof to an auditor (if they know all of the participants’ public keys) about which corresponding private keys were used to sign. The alternative method would enhance the privacy and fungibility of transactions made by single-sig users, multisignature users, and users of certain contract protocols such as taproot-enabled LN or advanced coinswaps. This wouldn’t be any more effective at preventing fee sniping, but it would provide a good reason for regular wallets to set their nSequence values to the same values that are required for transactions in certain multisignature-based contract protocols, such as ideas for coinswaps and taproot-enabled LN. ● BIP proposed for wallets to set nSequence by default on taproot transactions: Chris Belcher posted a draft BIP to the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list suggesting an alternative way wallets can implement anti fee sniping. Readers celebrating the lock-in of taproot may also wish to read a short thread about taproot’s origins and history by developer Pieter Wuille. All signers have to agree on the protocol to use, so there may be a network effect where many implementations choose to use the same protocol. The coordinator may also do this for them<br>p>
The wallets then all update their versions of the PSBT with their partial signatures, sending the PSBTs to the other wallets or the coordinator. If the finalizer is miniscript aware, it can sort the witness data from all the provided PSBTs into a single complete witness, making the spending transaction valid. Bitcoin can be used to book hotels on Expedia, shop for furniture on Overstock and buy Xbox games. This has led to the rise of fake ICOs which, with some slick marketing and a little bit of hype, http://www.youtube.com can convince people to buy a cryptocurrency that doesn’t actually exist. A proper introspection, one should never buy the best house in business. 3. When one of the wallets wants to spend the funds, it uses a PSBT-based workflow similar to what it would use with script-based multisig, but now two rounds of communication between signers are required. It eliminates one round of communication and allows another round to be combined with key exchange. Its communication between participants can’t be combined with key exchange, but it has the advantage that it’s not vulnerable to the repeated session attack. The aggregated public key can be used to receive P2TR p<br>n<br>
Kosakovsky’s proposal is to create a super-keychain whose child keys are transformed into seeds, seed words, or other data that can be input into various wallets’ HD keychain recovery fields. This week’s newsletter celebrates the lock-in of the taproot soft fork, describes a draft BIP for improving transaction privacy by varying the fields used to implement anti fee sniping, and features an article about the challenges of combining transaction replacement with payment batching. In the normal case, the above has exactly as much efficiency and privacy as a single-sig or multisignature transaction. Overall, if the proposal is implemented, it will allow users of regular single-sig transactions or uncomplicated multisignatures to join together with users of contract protocols to mutually improve each others’ privacy and fungibility. Several developers are working on threshold signature schemes that will bring the same efficiency and privacy benefits of multisignatures to k-of-n scenarios, but there’s a simple trick that can be used until those schemes are available. 19866. Users that build Bitcoin Core with eBPF tracing enabled can hook into the tracepoints with the provided example scripts or write their own tracing scripts for greater observability into the node when a new block is connected, inbound P2P messages are received, and outbound P2P me<br>es are sent. -
AutorEntradas
- Debes estar registrado para responder a este debate.