Etiquetado: 22
- Este debate tiene 0 respuestas, 1 mensaje y ha sido actualizado por última vez el hace 1 año, 1 mes por margenefifer82.
-
AutorEntradas
-
8 octubre, 2023 a las 2:44 am #11512margenefifer82Participante
<br> In this tutorial, you learned about Binance and its concepts like ‘What is Bianace’, BNB Coin, and how it works. Mike Schmidt: Maybe dig a bit deeper into this multiplier concept, like what needs to be – I know that’s not something that is getting moved forward with, I just want to understand a bit myself. Mike Schmidt: And those techniques that you mentioned, is that the boomerang and the spear that we mentioned in the newsletter? Mike Schmidt: Well, speaking of jamming, the next topic from the Summit was Channel jamming mitigation proposals. Mike Schmidt: Go ahead, Murch. Mike Schmidt: Next section from the Summit discussed PTLCs and redundant overpayments. Bastien Teinturier: Okay, so PTLCs are a change that is allowed by taproot and adaptor signatures. While developers are improving the software they cannot force a change in the Bitcoin protocol because all users are free to choose what software and version they use. So, those are things that we’ve always been just hand-wavy about how we would do that in the future.
So, what if you could instead send more than what you are actually trying to send to increase the likelihood that at least the required amount gets to the destination, but while preventing the recipient from claiming more than what you intended them to have. Bastien Teinturier: So basically jamming, there are two types of jamming, slow jamming and fast jamming, and those two types of jamming potentially and most likely need two different kinds of solutions. So for fast jamming, paying upfront fees all the time, whenever you send an HTLC, even if it’s going to fail, you pay a small fee, a fixed upfront fee. This is a very easy way to solve fast jamming, but the issue is that it has an impact on normal users as well, because if you’re a normal user, you try to make payments, you have a lot of failures before you actually get to the recipient, you will have paid upfront fees for failures that you may think are not your fault, not something you should be paying for. So, this is a very nice improvement and it also opens the door to creating more things on top of normal payments like redundant overpayments<br>p>
So, what is the point of playing this game in the first place? But with these both redundant overpayments and also with the stepless payment, basically we first establish the contract and once we get a response from the recipient that they have received sufficient parts of the contract, we would only then exchange the secret; and once they have the secret, we can exchange the secret in a form in which they are only allowed to pull in enough payments. All trading strategies are used at your discretion and at your own risk. Margin trading is widely used in stock, commodity, and Forex trading, as well as the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency markets. I will aim for the content to have a focus on technology, but will also cover some non technical stuff as well. Bastien Teinturier: Yeah, and even if it was only 50% more or even 20% more, that could be considered jamming as well. Bastien Teinturier: Yes, exactly. Bastien Teinturier: Yeah, that’s actually the hard part. I don’t know. That’s up to people to figure out, I guess. So, it’s really hard to figure out where to draw the <br> <br>e.
So, unless there’s obvious timing, amount, 바이낸스 입금수수료 and expiry values that lets you know that this is actually the same payment, at least the cryptography of the secrets that are shared will not let you correlate those two payments. So right now, the way channels are announced, it has to be specific 2-of-2 multisig, looks exactly like ln-penalty channels. And right now, it’s going to use the same payment hash with all these nodes, which means that if someone owns two of the nodes in the path, they are learning information, and this is bad for privacy. A proof-of-reserve audit is typically conducted by an independent third party to ensure the custodian’s assets are owned as claimed. And I think the original stock list is essentially like, you can do the full payment 100%, and then you can also do a secondary and a third. So, it’s not immediately clear to me, like, is that even necessarily better? So, we would have to do more research on how we actually really want to do redundant overpayment. We’ve also spoken with Clara and Sergei about their research work involving upfront fees and local reputation. By the end of 2018 Q3, the company is aiming at receiving an approval by the International Telecommunication Union followed by expanding the list of mobile operators and service providers they <br> with by 201 Q4. -
AutorEntradas
- Debes estar registrado para responder a este debate.