Etiquetado: 27
- Este debate tiene 0 respuestas, 1 mensaje y ha sido actualizado por última vez el hace 1 año, 1 mes por oliverprell00.
-
AutorEntradas
-
29 septiembre, 2023 a las 2:11 am #10472oliverprell00Participante
<br> Does Binance have the best referral program out there? If accepted, this will allow both full nodes and lightweight clients to communicate blocks, transactions, and control messages without ISPs being able to eavesdrop on the connections, which can make it harder to determine which program originated a transaction (especially in combination with Bitcoin Core’s existing transaction origin protection or future proposals such as the Dandelion protocol). If the parties agree before creating the pubkey, they may also make it possible for fewer than all of them to sign, e.g. 2-of-3 of them must cooperate to sign. Simply visit a crypto exchange, create an account, and make your purchase – all without listening to the tiresome generic investment advice you must endure at a bank or fiat investment house. This can make the scheme appealing to existing services that gain from the additional security of Bitcoin multisig but lose from having to pay additional transaction fees for the extra pubkeys and signatures<br>>
<br>> Traders often make impulsive decisions based on their emotions, which can lead to losses. However, if the attack risk can be mitigated fully or partly by a non-controversial soft fork, that would certainly be nice. ● Close open RPC ports on nodes: about 13% of Bitcoin nodes appear to have their RPC ports open on unencrypted public connections, putting users of those nodes at risk. See the full news item below for additional details about the risk and recommended solutions. This week’s newsletter includes information about the first published release candidate for Bitcoin Core, news about BIP151 P2P protocol encryption and a potential future soft fork, top questions and answers from Bitcoin Stack Exchange, and some notable merges in popular Bitcoin infrastructure projects. This week’s newsletter contains a warning about communicating with Bitcoin nodes using RPC over unencrypted connections, links to two new papers about creating fast multiparty ECDSA keys and signatures that could reduce transaction fees for multisig users, and lists some notable merges from popular Bitcoin infrastructure projects. Schnelli is also working with other developers to implement and test the NewHope key exchange protocol which is believed to be resistant to attacks by quantum computers so that an eavesdropper who records communication between two peers today won’t be able to decrypt that data in a future where they posses a fast quantum computer.<br>>
All you need are two or more wallets that implement multiparty ECDSA key generation and signing. The P2P Platforms offer a considerable amount of administrations, for example, a safe technique for installment between the two gatherings, and there is a little administration charge for that. So far, Johnson Lau has proposed one technique. The sweep transactions set nLockTime to the current block chain height, implementing the same anti-fee sniping technique adopted by other wallets such as Bitcoin Core and GreenAddress, 바이낸스 [Full Write-up] helping to discourage chain reorgs and allowing LND’s sweep transactions to blend in with those other wallets’ transactions. RPC communication is not encrypted, so any eavesdropper observing even a single request to your server can steal your authentication credentials and use them to run commands that empty your wallet (if you have one), trick your node into using a fork of the block chain with almost no proof-of-work security, overwrite arbitrary files on your filesystem, or do othe<br>m<br>.
This can be much more efficient than Bitcoin’s current multisig, which requires placing k signatures and n pubkeys into transactions for k-of-n security, whereas multiparty ECDSA would always require only one signature and one pubkey for any k or n. Occasionally users of Bitcoin Core need to rescan the block chain to see if any historic transactions affected their wallet-for example, when they import a new private key, public key, or address. 2063: new functions for creating sweep transactions have been added, replacing functions from the UTXO Nursery that is “dedicated to incubating time-locked outputs.” These new functions accept a list of outputs, generate a transaction for them with an appropriate fee that pays back into the same wallet (not a reused address), and signs the transaction. Gregory Maxwell has asked the Bitcoin protocol development mailing list for proposed soft fork solutions to the attack before he proposes his own solution. 14291: For use with Bitcoin Core’s multiwallet mode, a new listwalletdir RPC can list all available wallets in the wallet directory. 14424: Fixes a likely regression in 0.17.0 for watch-only wallets that require users to import their public keys for multisig scripts (rather than just importing the script) in order for Bitcoin Core to attempt spending the script using RPCs such as fundrawtransaction with the includeWa<br>ng flag. -
AutorEntradas
- Debes estar registrado para responder a este debate.